Civil Law Cases
- Created by: blankspaced
- Created on: 02-04-16 22:41
View mindmap
- Civil Law Cases
- Negligence
- Blythe v Birmingham Water Works
- Contributory Negligence
- Froome v Butler
- Duty of Care
- Donoghue v Stevenson
- Caparo Industries v Dickman
- Caparo Three Part Test
- Foreseeability
- Langley v Dray
- Proximity
- Bourhill v Young
- Fair, Just and Reasonable
- Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence
- Foreseeability
- Caparo Three Part Test
- Breach of Duty
- Children
- Mullins v Richards
- Learners
- Nettleship v Weston
- Professionals
- Bolam v Freirn
- Risk Factors
- Public Benefit
- Watt v Hertfordshire CC
- Cost and Practicality
- Latimer v AEC Ltd
- Magnitude of Risk
- Paris v Stepney
- Probability of Harm
- Bolton v Stone
- Public Benefit
- Res Ipsa Loquitur
- Available
- Mahon v Osbourne
- Scott v St Katherine's Docks
- Not Available
- Easson v LNER
- Available
- Children
- Damages
- Factual Causation
- Barnett v Chelsea
- Remoteness
- The Wagon Mound
- Consequence (the Damage caused) does not have to be Foreseaable
- Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Company
- Method of Damage does not have to be Foreseeable
- Hughes v Lord Advocate
- Extent of Damage does not have to be Foreseeable
- Vacwell Engineering v BHD Chemicals
- Thin Skull Test
- Smith v Leech Brain Industries
- Factual Causation
- Lump Sum/ Compensation
- Siddiqua v Ingram
- Hughes v McKeown
- Negligence
Comments
No comments have yet been made