Employers Liability
- Created by: ElleW88
- Created on: 11-12-19 18:58
View mindmap
- Employers Liability
- Volenti and the doctrine of common employment, the restrictions on claims by one employee for the torts of another.
- Smith v Baker 1891
- I.C.I v Shatwell
- Law Reform 1948
- The Personal, non-delegable duty
- The employer remains personally liable for breach, even if the task of operating a safe system has been delegated to another
- McDermid v Nash Dredging and Reclamation Co Ltd 1987
- The employer remains personally liable for breach, even if the task of operating a safe system has been delegated to another
- The nature of the duty
- A duty to take reasonable care
- Davie v New Merton Board Mills Ltd 1959
- Owed to each employee Individually
- Paris v Stepney Borough Council
- Qualcasrt v Haynes 1959
- Bux v Slough Metals 1973
- The relationship between the duty and the contract of Employment
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority 1991
- A duty to take reasonable care
- The elements of the Duty
- 1. Competent Staff
- 2. Adequate Plant an Equipment
- 3. Safe Place of work
- 4. Proper System
- McDermid v Nash Dredging and Reclamation Co Ltd 1987
- General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas 1953
- Cook V square D Ltd 1992
- Johnson v Coventry Churchill International 1992
- Latimer v AEC 1953
- Smith v N.C.B 1967
- 4. Proper System
- Toronto Power v Paskwan
- Parkinson v Lyle Shipping Co Ltd 1964
- 3. Safe Place of work
- Hudson v Ridge Manufactureing Co Ltd 1957
- 2. Adequate Plant an Equipment
- Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltd
- Walker v Northumberland County Council 1995
- Psychiatric Injury
- 1. Competent Staff
- Conway v George Wimpey &Co Ltd 1951
- Rose v Plenty 1976
- Volenti and the doctrine of common employment, the restrictions on claims by one employee for the torts of another.
Comments
No comments have yet been made