Fatal offences against the person

?
View mindmap
  • Fatal offences against the person
    • Murder
      • The unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought
      • Common law offence and indictable offence= triable only by jury in the crown court
        • Mandatory life imprisonment (not necessarily life imprisonment)
      • AR- the unlawful killing of a human being
        • MR-  malice aforethought: direct/oblique intent to kill and direct/oblique intent to cause really serious harm (DPP v Smith, R v Saunders
    • Voluntary manslaughter
      • Defences= loss of control and diminished responsibility (partial defences, reducing murder to manslaughter) MURDER ONLY
        • Loss of control (s 54 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009)
          • D must lose control
          • Because of a qualifying trigger
            • D's fear of serious violence from the V
              • R v Dawes
          • A person of their same sex and age with a normal degree of tolerance, might have reacted the same
          • R v Clinton- Can't use sexual infidelity as a defence
        • Diminished responsibility (s52 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009)
          • Was D suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning
            • Is there a medical condition?
              • Did this prevent their ability to understand the nature of their conduct or form a rational judgement or exercise self control?
            • Reasonable person would see it as abornal
    • Involuntary manslaughter
      • Constructive Act Manslaughter (CAT)
        • Caused by D's unlawful conduct (R v Lowe 1973)
          • must be unlawful e.g. robbery, assault ect.
          • Must be dangerous (R v Church 1965)
      • Gross negligent manslaughter (GNM)
        • Death is caused by D's gross negligence
          • R v Adomako= the Adomako test
            • D owd a duty of care to V
              • D breached that duty of care- objective test, reasonable person
                • There was a serious and obvious risk of death during the breach (R v Singh 1999)
                  • It was reasonably foreseeable there there is a serious/ obvious risk of death
                    • The breach caused more than minimal contribution to the death of V
                      • In view of the jury, the circumstances of the breach were so bad that it amounted to GNM

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »