8. Globalisation, green crime, human rights and state crimes
- Created by: Amy Parkinson
- Created on: 04-05-15 13:16
View mindmap
- Globalisation, green crime, human rights and state crimes
- Crime and globalisation
- Globalisation= the increasing interconnectedness of societies through improved technology, communication and technology
- The global criminal economy
- HELD ET AL
- There has been globalisation of crime
- The same processes that have brought about the globalisation of legitimate activities have also brought about the spread of transnational organised crime
- Globalisation creates new opportunities for crime, new means of committing crime and new offences
- CASTELLS
- There is now a global criminal economy worth over £1 trillion p/a
- Part of the reason for the scale of the global criminal economy is because of the demand for its products and services in the rich west
- However, the global criminal economy could not function without a supply side
- This criminal economy takes a number of forms:
- Arms trafficking
- Trafficking in nuclear materials
- Smuggling of illegal immigrants
- Trafficking in women and children
- Sex tourism
- Trafficking in body parts
- Cyber-crimes
- Green crimes
- International terrorism
- Smuggling of legal goods
- Trafficking in cultural artefacts
- Trafficking in endangered animals
- The drugs trade
- Money laundering
- HELD ET AL
- Global risk consciousness
- Globalisation creates new insecurities and produces a new mentality of 'risk consciousness'
- Much of our knowledge of risk comes from the media which often portrays an exaggerated views of the dangers we face
- The media often creates moral panics by giving out distorted images of crime and deviance
- One result of this is the intensification of social control at the national level
- Another result of globalised risk is the increased attempts at international cooperation and control in the various 'wars' on terror, drugs and crime
- Globalisation, capitalism and crime
- TAYLOR
- Globalisation has led to changes in the pattern and extent of crime
- By giving free rein to market forces, globalisation has created greater inequality and rising crime
- Globalisation has created crime at both ends of the social spectrum
- Globalisation has allowed transnational corporations to switch manufacturing to low-wage countries, producing job insecurity, unemployment and poverty
- The lack of legitimate job opportunities destroys self-respect and drives the unemployed to look for illegitimate ones
- Globalisation also creates criminal opportunities on a grand scale for elite groups
- Globalisation has also led to new patterns of employment which have created new opportunities to crime
- EVAL: Taylor's theory is useful in linking global trends in the capitalist economy to changes in the pattern of crime
- TAYLOR
- Patterns of criminal organisation
- Globalisation and de-industrialisation has created new criminal opportunities and patterns at a local level
- HOBBS & DUNNINGHAM
- The way crime is organised is linked to the economic changes brought by globalisation
- It involves individuals with contacts acting as a 'hub' around which a loose-knit network forms, composed of others seeking opportunities and often linking legitimate and illegitimate activities
- This contrasts with the large-scale, hierarchy 'Mafia-style' criminal organisations of the past
- 'Glocal' organisation
- These new forms of organisation sometimes have international links, especially with the drugs trade but crime is still rooted in its local context
- HOBBS & DUNNINGHAM
- Crime works as a 'glocal' system
- That is, crime is still locally based but with global connections
- Changes associated with globalisation have led to changes in patterns of crime
- However, it is not clear that such patterns are new, nor that the older structures have disappeared
- McMafia
- GLENNY
- This refers to the organisations that emerged in Russia and Eastern Europe following the fall of communism- itself a major factor in globalisation
- She traces the origins of transnational organised crime to the break-up of the Soviet Union which coincided with the deregulation of global markets
- The collapse of the communist state heralded a period of increased disorder
- To protect their wealth, capitalists turned to the mafias
- The new Russian Mafia's were purely economic organisations formed to pursue self-interest
- With the assistance of these violent organisations the rich were able to find protection for their wealth and a means of moving it out of the country
- The Russian Mafias were able to build links with criminal organisations in other parts of the world
- Green crime
- 'Global risk society' and the environment
- Unlike the natural disasters of the past, the major risks we face today are of our own making
- BECK
- In today's late modern society we can now provide adequate resources for all
- However, the massive increase in productivity and the technology that sustains it have created new 'manufactured risks'
- Many of theses risks are global leading Beck to describe late modern society as 'global risk society'
- Green criminology
- But what if the pollution that causes global warming or acid rain is perfectly legal and no crime has been committed? Is this a matter for criminologists?
- Traditional criminology has not been concerned with so called 'green crimes' since no law has been broken
- Green criminology takes a more radical approach and starts from the notion of harm rather than criminlal law
- This type of criminology is a form of transgressive criminology- it oversteps the boundaries of traditional criminology to include new issues
- Nation-states and transnational corporations adopt what WHITE calls an anthropocentric or human-centred view of environmental harm. This view assumes that humans have a right ot dominat enature
- Opposite to the anthropocentric view is the ecocentric view which sees humans and the environment as interdependent so that environmental harm hurts humans as well
- Green criminology tends to take this ecocentric view
- Types of green crimes
- Primary crimes
- Crimes that result directly from the destruction and degradation of the earths' resources
- 1. Crimes of air pollution
- 2. Crimes of deforestation
- 3. Crimes of species decline and animal rights
- 4. Crimes of water pollution
- SOUTH's classification of green crimes
- Secondary crimes
- Crimes that grows out of the flouting of rules aimed at preventing or regulating environmental disasters
- 1. State violence against oppositional groups
- 2. Hazardous waste and organised crime
- Primary crimes
- EVAL
- + It recognises the growing importance of environmental issues
- - By focussing on the much broader concept of harms rather than simply on legally defined crimes, it is hard to define the boundaries
- 'Global risk society' and the environment
- State crime
- Marxists such as CHAMBLISS argues that we should investigate 'state-organised crime' as well as crimes of capitalism
- GREEN & WARD
- 'State crime is 'illegal or deviant activities perpetrated by or with the complicity of state agencies'
- State crimes can include torture, genocide, war crimes, imprisonment without trial and assassination
- McLAUGHLIN's 4 categories of state crime:
- 1. Political crimes, e.g. corruption and censorship
- 2. Crimes by security and police forces, e.g. genocide, torture
- 3. Economic crimes, e.g. official violations of health and safety laws
- 4. Social and cultural crimes such as institutional crimes
- State crime is one of the most serious forms of crime for 2 reasons:
- 1. The scale of state crime
- The power of the state allows it to commit extremely large scale crimes with widespread victimisation
- The state's monopoly of violence gives it the potential to inflict massive harm, while its power means it is well placed to conceal its crimes or evade punishment for them
- The principle of national sovereignity- that states are the supreme authority within their own borders- makes it very difficult for external authorities to intervene
- 2. The state is the source of the law
- It is the states role to define what is criminal and to manage the CJS and prosecute the offenders
- Its power to define criminality allows it to avoid defining its own harmful actions as criminal
- State control of the CJS also means that ut can persecute its enemies
- 1. The scale of state crime
- Human rights and state crime
- There is no single agreed list of what constitutes human rights but most definitions include:
- Natural rights, that people are regarded as having simply by virtue of existing
- Civil rights, such as the right to vote, to privacy, to a fair trial or to educati0on
- THE SCHWENDINGER'S
- We should define crime in terms of the violation of basic human rights, rather than breaking of legal rules
- States that disregard these human rights must be seen as criminal
- In this view, the definition of crime is inevitably political
- There is no single agreed list of what constitutes human rights but most definitions include:
- State crime and the culture of denial
- Although COHEN criticises the SHWENDINGERS, he nevertheless sees the issue of human rights and state crime as increasingly central both to political debate and criminology as a result of 2 factors:
- The growing impact of the international human rights movement
- The increased focus within criminology upon victims
- The spiral of denial
- While dictatorships generally simply deny committing human rights abuses, democratic states have to legitimate their actions in more complex ways
- Their justifications follow a 3-stage 'spiral of state denial':
- 1. 'It didnt happen
- 2. 'If it did happen, 'it' is something else'
- 3. 'Even if it is what you say it is, it's justified'
- COHEN
- Neutralisation theory
- He also examines the ways in which states and their officials deny or justify their crimes using SYKES & MATZA's 5 neutralisation techniques:
- Denial of victim
- Denial of injury
- Denial of responsibility
- Condemning the condemners
- Appeal to higher loyalty
- He also examines the ways in which states and their officials deny or justify their crimes using SYKES & MATZA's 5 neutralisation techniques:
- The social construction of state crime
- It is often thought that those who carry out crimes like torture must be psychopaths yet research suggests that this is not the case
- Sociologists argue that such actions are part of a role into which individuals are socialised
- KELMAN & HAMILTON's 3 features that produce crimes of obedience
- Authorisation, when acts are ordered or approved by those in authory
- Routinisation, repeating the act until it can be performed in a detached manner
- Dehumanisation, when the enemy is portrayed as sub-human
- Some argue that modern society creates the conditions for such crime on a vast- scale
- BAUMAN
- For the Nazis to commit mass murder, many of the feautures of modernity were essesntial
- Although COHEN criticises the SHWENDINGERS, he nevertheless sees the issue of human rights and state crime as increasingly central both to political debate and criminology as a result of 2 factors:
- Crime and globalisation
Comments
No comments have yet been made