Kant - criticism and amendments
- Created by: Vanessa_tanti
- Created on: 27-01-21 09:34
View mindmap
- some criticisms and amendments of Kant
- justice
- morality of an action not derived from the benefit produced but intrinsic rightness of the action performed
- distinction between duty and inclination
- people of good will obey a law which is universal
- my duties to others are no different to my duties to myself
- people of good will obey a law which is universal
- laws that are universal and not self-contradictory
- possible to arrive at a rule that are neither preferential or morally significant
- rule universalised does not have to be morally good or even moral at all
- Kant suggests the practical test - rejecting what is contrary the objectives that all rational people have
- love, compassion and sympathy
- always needing to think of duty rather than feelings makes them a worse person?
- different way of phrasing maxim makes it universal
- should not be the way of phrasing but the maxim in itself should be judged for its universality
- justice
- limitations of absolutism
- making exceptions are morally permissible-decision made without exceptions may be morally reprehensible
- when our duties conflict?
- some criticisms and amendments of Kant
- justice
- morality of an action not derived from the benefit produced but intrinsic rightness of the action performed
- distinction between duty and inclination
- people of good will obey a law which is universal
- my duties to others are no different to my duties to myself
- people of good will obey a law which is universal
- laws that are universal and not self-contradictory
- possible to arrive at a rule that are neither preferential or morally significant
- rule universalised does not have to be morally good or even moral at all
- Kant suggests the practical test - rejecting what is contrary the objectives that all rational people have
- love, compassion and sympathy
- always needing to think of duty rather than feelings makes them a worse person?
- different way of phrasing maxim makes it universal
- should not be the way of phrasing but the maxim in itself should be judged for its universality
- justice
- making exceptions are morally permissible-decision made without exceptions may be morally reprehensible
Similar Philosophy resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made