Non fatals mind map
- Created by: Lucy Hodgson
- Created on: 08-05-13 09:03
View mindmap
- Non-Fatal Offences.
- Assault
- Defined as: intentionally or recklessly causing the victim to fear immediate or unlawful harm.
- The actus reus of assault must have the three following elements:
- 1. Causing the victim to apprehend violence.
- 2. Immediate violence.
- 3. Unlawful violence.
- Logdon - the victim had a gun pointed at her. She fear unlawful force but it was only a toy gun, he just wanted to scare her
- Smith v Chief Constable of Woking Police Station there were no words just actions but the victim felt threatened by him sat staring into her window.
- Ireland - making silent telephone calls can cause psychiatric harm, and therefore is assault.
- s.39of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Battery
- Defined as: the unlawful application of force to another.
- Thomas - caretaker touching a 12 year old girls skirt - touching clothes can be battery.
- Haystead - punched girlfriend who dropped baby. Indirect force is sufficient enough for battery.
- Venna - This is the mens rea of battery. It still allows recklessness to be in the means rea for battery.
- s. 39 of the Criminla Justice Act 1988
- ABH
- s. 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861
- The actus reus has three elements:
- Assault
- Occassioning
- Actual bodily harm
- Chan-Fook: this case defines ABH as physical harm or psychiatric harm.
- Smith - hair can be included in ABH.
- Roberts - the def had the mens rea to cause an injury as well as actus reus.
- Mens rea is defined as the intention or recklessness as to an assault or battery.
- Savage - This case helps to define mens rea as maliciously - but it must have intention or recklessness too.
- GBH wounding with intent
- s. 20 of the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861.
- The actus reus has three elements again that are nedded
- Wounding
- Grievous Bodily Harm.
- Unlawful
- JCC v Eisenhower - this case tells us that a wound needs to break two layers of skin to classed as a wound.
- Brown and Stratton - this case defines a collection of minor injuries to amount to GBH.
- The mens rea is set out as maliciously but with intention and/or recklessness.
- GBH
- s. 18 of the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861.
- Belfon - this case decided that if there is to be conviction, the def must have had the specific intent to do GBH or resist arrest.
- The actus reus is wounding or inflicting GBH.
- The mens rea is specific ntent to wound or cause GBH or resist arrest.
- Assault
Similar Law resources:
Teacher recommended
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made