Sentencing and ethics

?
  • Created by: KG1999!
  • Created on: 08-10-23 14:30
View mindmap
  • Sentencing and ethics
    • Sentencing
      • 1. Punish offenders     2. Reduction of crime        3. Reform and rehabilitate   4. Protect public           5. Reparation by offenders
      • Principles of sentencing
        • Seriousness: how culpable is offender, intended to harm, reckless whether harm could be caused, D knew about risk but didnt intent to cause harm, D was negligent
        • Aggravating and mitigating factors - Does D have previous convictions, has D committed offences on bail, racial or religious agro, sex based hostility
        • Totality principle - associated offences i.e. D committed several types of similar offences
      • Types of sentence
        • Custodial = D deprived of physical liberty
        • Community sentence = D required to take part in activities within the community
        • Fine
        • Discharge = not to sentence offender. Could be conditions i.e. dont commut something else for a while.
      • Ancillary orders
        • Compensation = for injury or loss suffered by victim
        • Costs = prosecution costs or D costs
        • Victim surcharge - flat rate payable to victim - offence committed on or after 8 April 2016
        • Forfeiture orders - may order forfeiture of any property that was in Ds possession when apprehended if use for committing offence, intended to be used to do so
        • Confiscation and restitution orders - D appearing in CC may be made subject of confiscation order in respect of proceeds of criminal activity
        • Criminal behaviour orders (formally ASBOs).
        • Binding over order - requires person to keep the peace by refraining from specific activities
        • Sex offences - details put on sex offenders reg
        • Serious crime prevention orders - on property or business, working arrangements, means an individual communicates with others, premises they have access to, their travel
    • Plea in mitigation
      • Preparation
        • Identify max and likely sentence: High, medium or lesser culpability. Level of harm - any factors indicate significant additional harm. Offence category. Cross reference category and capability
        • Study pre-sentence report. Prepared by probation service with view to assistance court in determining most suitable way to deal with offender. CONTAINS: details of offence and Ds attitude towards, info about personal history and family, officers assessment of risk of harm of re-offending
        • Determine the objective - what sentence should we be aiming for?
      • Structure
        • 1. Objective = court may be minded to impose particular sentence but hope to persuade the court that a lesser sentence will be more suitable
        • 2. The offence = minimise impact of any aggravating factors and emphasis mitigation factors
          • Minimise agro - planned or premed, group/gang, target vulnerable groups, under influence of drink/drugs, weapon, deliberate damage/violence, abuse position of trust, those in public sector, high value
            • Highlight mitigating - impulsive, greater degree of provocation, minor role, motive of fear
        • 3. The offender (sob story). Minimise ag = failure to respond to previous sentences. Highlight mitigation = mental illness, young or old, remorseful. Highlight family = reg home and job, children, lose job. Highlight early guilty plea = co-op with police,
          • Distinguish previous convicts (differ) = explain how, how long ago, absence of convictions too, good character. Other consequences of conviction = lose position. Risk of re-offending = pre-sentence report.
        • 4. Suggest sentence = lower than likely, realistic, if same as pre-sentence report they should highlight this. Suggest ancillary orders. Explain purpose i.e. punishment, rehab, deterrence
    • Conduct issues
      • Client suggests influence C to make them drop case - in best interest (7) BUT have to act with integrity (5) and uphold rule of law (1). Should not tamper with evidence. Client may pervert the course of justice.
      • Client informs guilty after acquitted - no danger of sols misleading court. Client confidentiality lasts beyond end of retainer.
      • If informed before acquittal - act with integrity (5) and uphold rule of law (1). Advise them to plead guilty. Or must cease to act.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Dispute Resolution resources »