Using your own knowledge as well as the extract, consider the extent to which Parliament may be said to have ‘undermined the independence of the judiciary’.
Teacher recommended
?- Created by: Dulcimer
- Created on: 07-03-14 17:41
View mindmap
- Using your own knowledge as well as the extract, consider the extent to which Parliament may be said to have ‘undermined the independence of the judiciary’.
- The judiciary is independant
-
Consolidated
Fund
- The independence of the judges is protected by the fact that judges receive fixed salaries not subject to parliamentary approval
-
Court
proceedings are sub judice
- they cannot be discussed in parliament
-
Judges
have security of tenure
- they cannot be sacked by the Government
-
The
Constitutional Reform Act 2005
- enshrines judicial independence by creating a new Supreme Court independent of the executive and legislature
-
It
also protects judicial independence by establishing the Judicial
Appointments Commission
- the appointment of judges is now not completely in the hands of the Prime Minister
-
Consolidated
Fund
- Parliament has undermined the independance of the judiciary
-
They
can’t declare Acts of Parliament unconstitutional
- because there is not a codified constitution in the UK which they can judge statute law against
- only Parliament can make law and no other body can set aside a law made by Parliament
- principle derives from the 1689 Bill of Rights
- Parliament can act with little regard to existing law in various ways
- changing laws when they have not been happy with judicial rulings
- interfering in penalties imposed by judges
-
They
can’t declare Acts of Parliament unconstitutional
- The judiciary is independant
Similar Government & Politics resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made