Why was there no settlement 1649-53?
- Created by: Lauriie
- Created on: 26-04-16 22:13
View mindmap
- Why was there no settlement 1649-53?
- The Rump Parliament
- Events
- Spring 1649
- Aug 1649- May 1650: Irish campaign
- Summer 1650
- Spring 1651
- Summer 1651
- Spring 1652
- 20 April 1653: Cromwell dissolves the Rump
- Jan: appointment of the Hale commission
- May: beginning of first Anglo Dutch War
- July-Aug: CII invades England
- 3 Sept: the Battle of Dunbar
- Spring 1652
- Jan: CII crowned by the Scots
- Summer 1651
- July 1650- Aug 1651: Scottish campaign
- Summer 1651
- Spring 1652
- 20 April 1653: Cromwell dissolves the Rump
- Jan: appointment of the Hale commission
- May: beginning of first Anglo Dutch War
- July-Aug: CII invades England
- 3 Sept: the Battle of Dunbar
- Spring 1652
- 3 Sept: Battle of Dunbar
- Summer 1651
- Charles II lands in Scotland
- 27 Sept: the Toleration Act
- Spring 1651
- 11 Sept: Drogheda falls
- 11 Oct: Wexford falls
- Summer 1650
- Summer 1649
- Spring 1650
- Summer 1650
- Spring 1651
- Jan: CII crowned by the Scots
- July 1650- Aug 1651: Scottish campaign
- 3 Sept: Battle of Dunbar
- Charles II lands in Scotland
- 27 Sept: the Toleration Act
- Spring 1651
- Jan: Engagement Act
- Summer 1650
- Spring 1650
- Jan 4: Commons declares itself supreme power
- Jan 30 CI is executed
- Feb 5: CI declared King by the Scots
- March 17-19 : Acts abolishing the monarchy and the lords
- May 14-15 Leveller uprising
- Aug 1649- May 1650: Irish campaign
- Spring 1649
- Reforms
- 1650 acts for godly reformation: suppressed swearing, drinking, blaspemy etc
- laws on obseving holy days and on spreading the gospel to the three kingdoms
- Toleration Act: Limited
- September 1649: Act for the relief of poor debtors
- Jan 1643: set up the Hale Comission for law reform- but didn't implement any
- 1650 acts for godly reformation: suppressed swearing, drinking, blaspemy etc
- Opposition
- The Levellers: imprisoned leaders and put down a rebellion
- The Irish: suppressed by Cromwell in 1649
- The Scots: military campaign 1650-51
- The Dutch: trade war
- The Army: felt that the Rump was corrupt
- Religious radicals: meant to be shut up be reforms
- Reason for failure
- April 1653: dissolved by Cromwell and soldiers while discussing a bill for new elections
- Cromwell had forced the readmission of members secluded in Prides' Purge: they couldn't agree on anything
- diplomatic paralisis: couldn't end the Anglo-Dutch war
- failure to carry out godly reformation
- toleration act: made people attend a sermon weekly
- alienated the army and suppressed radical groups such as the Levellers
- heavy economic burden
- Events
- The Nominated Assembly / Barebones Parliament / Parliament of Saints
- Events
- April 1653: Cromwell dissolves the Rump
- July 1653: Nominated Assembly opens
- December 1653
- 10 Dec: radicals defeat a moderate proposal to retain tithes
- 12 Dec: moderates vote to return their power to Cromwell, NA is dissolved
- December 1653
- July 1653: Nominated Assembly opens
- April 1653: Cromwell dissolves the Rump
- What was it?
- 140 members of the gentry
- a few London tradespeople
- 'of approved fidelity and honesty'
- godly
- Scots and Irish represented
- Mostly nominated by army officers
- met regularly 6 days/week from 8 am
- 140 members of the gentry
- Reforms
- Huge and successful program of social reform
- Acts for the relief of poor creditors and poor prisoners
- Acts to regulate the conditions under which the mentally ill were kept
- legalised civil marriages performed by JPs
- established legislation for the probate of wills, marriages and births registration
- were drafting
- law reforms from the Hale commission
- proposals to rationalise the taxation system and abolish the hated excise tax
- Brought Scotland and Ireland further under English control
- Huge and successful program of social reform
- Opposition
- The Levellers: John Lilburne's trial caused so much protest that he was aquitted
- An (undeserved) negative image
- seen as a radical religious and military dictatorship led by Fifth Monarchists such as Thomas Harrison
- but in fact it was only meant to be a temporary measure, though it was democratic
- Capp and Woolrych: only 13 out of 140 nominated members were Fifth Monarchists
- seen as men 'unfit to rule'
- Common tradespeople such as Praise-god Barebone, a leatherseller
- but the vast majority were gentlement
- people thought they spent too long considering ridiculous / utopian reforms
- but they passed more legislation than the Rump
- seen as a radical religious and military dictatorship led by Fifth Monarchists such as Thomas Harrison
- Why did it fail?
- ripped apart by conflict between the radicals and the moderates
- Manifested itself in tithes: moderates wanted to keep them (self interest, protection of property and social order)
- weakened by its bad reputation
- ripped apart by conflict between the radicals and the moderates
- Events
- The Army
- after the completion of the Scottish and Irish campaigns the Army didn't have much else to do
- put pressure on the Rump for godly reform
- anger at lack or progress
- Toleration Act/ Hale comission
- MPs were 'sitting on bayonets'
- anger at lack or progress
- Expensive: £111 000 / month
- Dec 1652: Monthy assessment increased
- Situational factors
- created by force (Pride's Purge)
- rested on minority support
- had to cope with the difficult legacy of the civil wars (religious /constitutional machinery destroyed, local communities angry and disillusioned, taxes.
- born out of the desire to execute CI, no actual commitment to republicanism
- radical religious and political groups
- Cromwell
- Became Lord General in 1650
- Blair Worden: 'ideological schizophrenia
- eg opinions on kingship, using force against parliament, political presbyterians
- failed to provide strong leadership:
- reliant on providence
- eg let the Nominated Assembly be taken over by radicals
- wanted to achieve godly reformation and constitutional propriety (Seel: 'mutually exclusive')
- invited back presbyterians then complained about a lack of reformation
- MPs
- Sean Kelsey: 'many of the so-called 'revolutionaries' were nothing of the sort'
- they came from the propertied levels of society and were often socially conservative
- they were fearful of groups such as the Levellers and the Diggers
- Only about 15% of the Rump could be labelled 'actively revolutionary'
- Presbyterians secluded by Prides' Purge had been readmitted
- Slow to pass any reforming legislation
- During the first 3 months average attendance was 56 MPs out of 211
- took ages to pass any religious reforming (Toleration Act) or constitutional legislation
- None of the reforms recommended by the Hale commission were passed
- Made unpopular political decisions (felt very insecure)
- demanded an 'Oath of Engagement' (only 19 members of the Council of State took it)
- little evidence that they were planning to stand down despite promises to dissolve the Rump in Nov 1653
- Sean Kelsey: 'many of the so-called 'revolutionaries' were nothing of the sort'
- The Rump Parliament
Comments
No comments have yet been made