'Paley's teleological argument successfully defends the existence of God' discuss
- Created by: lilyycurtis
- Created on: 07-01-24 19:51
'Paley's teleological argument successfully defends the existence of God' discuss |
||
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
EvaluationMany arguments against Paley's teleological proposition fail to successfully prove how it DOESN'T explain existence of God, hard to unpick as it is a very air-tight argument. Hume tries to unsuccessfully criticise Paley's argument because many see it as 'not based on analogy':-not purely based on an analogy of artefacts and the universe-his argument is simply that when there is a complex property performing a purpose, it is impossible for those properties to come about by 'chance'-man-made things have these complex properties, as well as parts of nature. therefore, nature has a designer because of its complexity, not because of analogies to man-made things- the watch is an illustration of this logic-therefore, Paley successfully uses his design argument to defend the existence of God. |
Comments
No comments have yet been made