Weber: Argued that in some cases religion can cause social change, he examined the Calvinist teachings of Calvin and found that believers were required to pursue an intensely active life of labour. He argued that work was a calling and God was most effectively worshipped through a disciplined life of work and denial of indulgence, anything that detracted from work was viewed as evil and over socialising or sleeping was regarded as sins. Weber argues that these teachings had a significant consequence for the capitalist system as it encouraged a rational calculating, efficient, highly committed approach to work which provided capitalism with the foundations to grow.
Tawney: Disagrees with Weber and suggests that it was a technological change not religious ideas that bought about capitalism.
Kautsky: Disagrees with Weber and believes as a Marxist that it was economic factors that caused capitalism.
Nelson: Points to a number of cases where religion has undermined or promoted social change. In Northern Ireland, Roman Catholicism has long been associated with Irish Republicanism; that is the desire to end British rule. In America Martin Luther King lead the role of establishing civil rights to reduce racial discrimination.
McGuire: Argues the ability for religion to cause change depends on certain factors such as: the beliefs of a particular religion, the culture of the society in which the religion exists, the social location of the religion.
Comments
No comments have yet been made