- PUBLIC INTEREST = law seeks to priotect and promote interests of individual and this is sometimes given priority over proving fault. Those who run firms must be prepared for risk(Smedleys v Breed) Public interests better served by using questions of fact than proving MR. Strict liability only affordable fines (Gammon)
- INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY = we reap what we sow, we're responsible for esuring compliance and we're at fault for failing to do so. Rose v Plenty accountable for actions
- DETERRENCE = encourages standards of care and promotes greater vigilance
- SAVING TIME = mens rea need not be proved, D more likely to plead guilty
Comments
No comments have yet been made