Is the PM now effectively a President?
- Arguments for: PMs now perform most of the functions of the head's of state, PMs now have extensive sources of their own, 10 Downing St now resembles the White House, the media tend to concentrate on the PM as a personal spokesman, foreign and military affairs have become increasingly important and the PM dominates these, spatial leadership looks like Presidential style.
- Arguments against the proposition: there has been no permanent change as the role of the PM constantly ebbs and flows, the substance role has not changed, there are important forces which rein in the PM which are absent for a President, he is not actually head of state.
Comments
No comments have yet been made