Aim: To examine the phsiological basis of pre-mentrual symptoms and to questions the validity of women's self-report of these symptoms
Sample- 44 womin undergraduates od princton universoty aged 18-24- taking part in research looking at a technique for predicting the expected date of menstraction
Method- Carried out in a university infirmary, intervied (unknow to them) on the sixth or seventh daybefore their next peroid. Assigned to experimental groups or control. ECG machine and told which group them belonged. They were then given a questionaire to rate the extent to which they had expirenced ths ymptoms in the questionaire
Results: Symptoms rated worse who thought they were pre-menstraul was significatly higher then those who had benn told they were intermenstraul for the symptoms eatching habits, water retention and pain
Conclusion:Deamnd characteristics, associations can cause woment to overstate what they are expirencing or affect a womens actual perception of her own body.
Comments
No comments have yet been made