It has methodological flaws.
Most of the evidence for the approach comes from case studies that focus on just one individual (who is usually suffering a mental illness); so such studies are unlikely to be representative of the general population. For example, just because Little Hans suffered an Oedipus complex doesn't mean all 5 year old males do. Another issue with this method is that the findings are subjective, meaning they're open to interpretation. Freud's interpretation that Han's phobia was a displaced Oedipus complex is contradicted by the behaviourist idea that perhaps he was operantly conditioned to fear horses after seeing one in a horrific accident.
Also, many of the concepts explained in the approach can't be directly observed, such as the unconscious mind or the id/ego and superego. Because they can't be tested, they can't be proved to exist (or not exist), meaning they're not falsified.
This means the psychodynamic approach may not provide valid or reliable explanation of behaviour.
Comments
No comments have yet been made