The Theft Act
Statute cards on Theft
- Created by: josie03
- Created on: 24-01-17 12:12
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 1
Theft: Definition
The Definition of theft is " To dishonestly appropriate the property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it".
This can be split into six different sections:
Section 1: Definition
Section 2: Dishonestly
Section 3: Appropriate
Section 4: Property
Section 5: Belonging to another
Section 6: With the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.
Mens Rea | Actus Reus
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 2
The Theft Act : Section 2 - Dishonestly
- There is no definition of dishonest
- There are 3 situations where the defendant is NOT dishonest
- 1 - He honestly believes in law he has the right to deprive the other of it.
- 2 - He believes he would have the owner's consent if the other knew of the appropriation.
- 3 - The person to whom the property belongs to cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
- This must be the defendants genuine honest belief not reasonable or correct.
Ghosh Test - lays out the tests needed to be followed to see if someone was dishonest in appropriating property. It is objective and subjective,
- 1. Was the action dishonest according to the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people?
- 2. Did the defendant realise that what he was doing was dishonest by these standards?
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 3
The Theft Act: Section 3 - Appropriation
Appropriation is defined as "Assuming the rights of the owner"
These rights could be lending, selling, destroying, hiring out etc
Some cases that portray appropriation are:
- R v Morris - Rights can be all or part
- R v Lawrence - Appropriation can be with the consent of the owner
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 4
The Theft Act: Section 4 - Property
"Property includes money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property"
- Money
- Real Property
- Personal Property
- Things in Action
- Other Intangible Property
Cases that help to define property are:
- Kelly and Lindsey - Dead bodies and body parts can be personal property
- Oxford v Moss - Knowledge and information cannot be stolen.
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 4 (3)
The Theft Act: Section 4(3)
- Picking fungi, flowers, foliage and fruit from the wild does not amount to theft, unless it is done for reward, sale or other commercial purpose.
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 4 (4)
The Theft Act: Section 4(4)
- Wild creatures that are untamed or not ordinarily kept cannot be stolen unless they have been or a being 'reduced into possession' by someone else.
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 5
The Theft Act: Section 5 - belonging to another
Definition of belonging to another is:The person having possession or control.
- The possession does not have to be lawful
- Turner no.2 - Defendant can be guilty of stealing their own property
Definition of belonging to another
- AGs Ref No.1 - Legal obligation to make restorarion when property is obtained by mistake
- Gilks - No legal obligation to make restoration in gambling situation.
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 6
The Theft Act: Section 6 - Intention to permanentlty deprive the other of it.
- The intention to never return the property.
- Velumyl - Must return the same property
- Lavender - Dispose is extended to mean deal
- Lloyd - If value of property has reduced then intention is present
- Eason - Conditional intent, is not sufficient
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 8
Robbery
- Definition: "Guilty if he steals and immediately before or at the time of doing so uses force on any person or seeks to put any person in fear of force."
- Actus Reus: Completed theft and force or threatened force (just before or at same time)
- Mens Rea: Sec. 2 and Sec. 6 and intend to use force to steal.
- Corcoran: There must be a complete theft
- Dawson and Jame: Force can be minimal
- Clouden: Force can be indirect
- Hale: Theft can be ongoing
- Lockley: Force cannot be used after theft to amount to robbery
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 9 (Entry)
Entry
- Not defined in act
- Collins: Effective and substantial entry
- Brown: Effective entry
- Ryan: Entry does not have to be effective or substantial
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 9 (Building)
Building
- Solid structure connected to utilities with locks and doors (Leathley)
- Theft Act 1968 gives an extended meaning to the word building - to include house boats and caravans
- No basic definition
- A mobile place is not a building (Seeking and Gould)
Part of a building
- Covers situations where defendant may have permission to be in one part of the building but not another
- Behind a counter (R v. Walkington)
- Other examples, store rooms, offices in colleges.
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 9 (Trespasser)
Trespasser
- Definition: Someone who does not have permission to be there (Collins
- Going beyond permission:
- If defendant goes beyond permission he becomes a trespasser.
- (Smith and Jones)
- Examples: Ticket = license
ENTRY BY FRAUD = TRESPASSER
The Theft Act 1968 - Section 9 (1) (a)
Burglary (9 (1) (a) )
A person is guilty if they: "Enter a building or part of a building as a trespasser with the intent to"
(actus reus)
1. Steal
2. Cause GBH
3. Criminal Damage
(ulterior offences)
- Mens rea -
- 1. Intend to trespass
- 2. Ulterior offences
Theft Act 1968 sec 9
Burglary (9(1) (b))
A person is guilty of burglary if "having entered a building or part of a building as a trespasser they commit or attempt to commit:
- Theft
- Cause GBH
(ulterior offences)
Mens rea (1. Intend to trespass, Mens rea of ulterior offences).
Comments
No comments have yet been made