The USA and the world
- Created by: Grant
- Created on: 08-04-13 12:47
The objectives of US foreign policy from 1890
Why did US foreign policy become more expansionist after 1890?
- Before 1890
- Defensive and inward looking
- After 1890
- Growth of big business, mass immigration and industrialisation changed foreign policy
- US wanted to protect trade
- By protecting trade US could increase economic growth
- Trade seen in foreign policy in:
- Building of the Panama Canal
- Spanish-American War
- Now imperialist foreign policy which would give them longer influence and power and a greater empire
- 1900 - US Navy third largest in the world
- Security seen in foreign policy in:
- Annexation of land such as Hawaii and Philippines
The objectives of US foreign policy from 1890
- Ideas of cultural and racial superiority - Civilising mission
- 'Manifest of Destiny' - Idea that it was the destiny and God-given right of the US to expand westwards
- Imperialist ideologies:
- Senator Henry Cabot Lodge
- Alfred Thayer Mahan
- TR
Evidence of expansionism
- Spanish-American War (1898) in Cuba
- Annexation of Hawaii and the Philippines
- Open Door Policy in China
- Platt Amendment
- Alaska Boundary Dispute
- Panama Canal's construction
- Roosevelt's Corollary
- Taft's Dollar Diplomacy
The objectives of US foreign policy from 1890
Why did the US intervene in Cuba and the Philippines, what was the outcome?
- Cuba was a Spanish colony
- Cuba exported cigars and sugar to the US
- Spain wanted full control of Cuba
- Cubans revolted against Spain; Spain crushed resistance with violence
- Cubans wanted US intervention
- US had no reason to intervene until USS Maine - which was docked in Havana - was blown up (1898)
- 'Yellow Press' supported by big business interests, found out
- US Navy, led by TR, took control of Cuba after a swift victory
- Roosvelt a national hero - 'Rough Riders'
- Treaty of Paris saw Cuba remain under US military rule until 1902
- US annexed other Spanish colonies
- Puerto Rico
- Guam
- Philippines
The objectives of US foreign policy from 1890
Why did the US intervene in Cuba and the Philippines, what was the outcome? (cont.)
- Like the Cubans, the Filipinos wanted independence from Spain
- Leader of the Filipino Campaign, Emilio Aguinaldo, coperated with Admiral Dewey
- Aguinaldo had a rebel force
- Dewey's fleet sailed into Manila Bay and destroyed the Spanish fleet
- US then establish military control
- Clear that the US wouldn't allow Filipino independence
- Filipinos revolted
- Revolt wasn't brought under control until 1902, when Philippines gave independence
- At home the US annexation of Philippines was controversial
- US citizens believed annexing Philippines betrayed freedom and equality principles
- Anti-Imperialist League attacked government for deserting anti-colonial ideas of Founding Fathers
- Criticised use of violence and racial prejudice shown by US in treatment of their 'little brown brothers'
- President McKinley and other politicians called it a 'civilising mission' to aid development of less advanced cultures
The objectives of foreign policy from 1890
Why did the US intervene in Cuba and the Philippines, what was the outcome? (cont.)
- Said different things in private
- Events in China and Philippines manipulated for US gain and to support interventionist policies
- Issues in Pacific and Far East more important to US after Spanish-American War
- Concerns about Japanese Empite and European Intervention in China
- Open Door Policy - To keep China from colonial rule
- US keen to see free trade in China
- Stop European powers taking over China
- US sent troops to break up revolt in China
- US feared Europeans would divide China up and US would have no power
Theodore Roosevelt and foreign policy
- 1901 - Platt Amendment
- Gave US power to intervene in Cuban affairs
The objectives of foreign policy from 1890
Theodore Roosevelt and foreign policy (cont.)
- 1903 - US and Canada settled Alaska Boundary dispute in favour of US
- Underlined TR's assertive approach
- 1903 - Panama Canal
- TR supported Panamanian uprising so a new republic of Panama could be created from Colombia
- 1904 - Roosevelt Corollary
- Sent to Monroe Doctrine
- Gave US power to intervene in Latin America in cases of wrongdoing
- 1905 - Morocco Crisis
- TR took a leading role in international response to crisis
- October 1905 - Treaty of Portsmotuh
- Negotiated peace in Russian-Japanese War
- Gained international prestige and ensured Japan wouldn't make excessive gains from victory over Russia
- Rise of Japanese power seen as a threat
The objectives of foreign policy from 1890
Theodore Roosevelt and foreign policy (cont.)
- Even after Taft won Republican nomiantion in 1908, TR still had massive influence over US foreign policy
Definitions
- Open Door Policy - Created to stop European powers dividing China and it allowed free trade
- Dollar Diplomacy - Used US financial power to secure domination of Latin American and Chinese economies. Woodrow Wilson reduced Dollar Diplomacy for a more ethical approach
Woodrow Wilson and foreign policy
- One hand he was an isolationist
- He turned away from Taft's Dollar Diplomacy and showed support for Open Door Policy
- Recognised new government in China, angering Japan
The objectives of foreign policy from 1890
Woodrow Wilson and foreign policy (cont.)
- On the other hand he was an interventionist
- Intervened in Mexico twice*
- (1) 1914 - Went after dictator, Huerta
- (2) 1916 - Went after Pancho Villa
- Took US into WWI
- Intervened in Mexico twice*
- Post-WWI: Key role in peace deals
- Treaty of Versailles
- Called for League of Nations
- *Mexican intervention
- (1) 1914 - Stabilise violence that had broken out after Mexican Revolution (1910-11)
- Revolution threatened US business interests
- Wilson sent in US marines
- Hoped they would overthrow dictator, Huerta, but it strengthened his position
- (1) 1914 - Stabilise violence that had broken out after Mexican Revolution (1910-11)
The objectives of foreign policy from 1890
- (2) 1916 - Sent large numbers of men to catch guerilla leader, Pancho Villa, who had attacked US residents in Columbus, NM
- Soldiers spent months chasing PV without success
- 1917 - Wilson withdrew troops
- Instability in Mexico still a problem
- US feared Germany would intervene
Success of Wilson's foreign policy
- Emphasised peace and ethics
- Diffrerent ideas to TR and Taft
- However, Wilson intervened in Mexico
- Unsuccessful in stabilising Mexio - Caused fear of German intervention in Mexico
- Entering WWI was against Wilson's morals but he had to do it for trade and security
- Wanted League of Nations after WWI - No one else did
- Conclusion - Fairly successful
The reasons for US entry into the First World War
Why didn't the US enter WWI?
- US should only enter foreign affairs if trade or security of US threatened
- US had no standing army - Made up of volunteers
- Opposition to large army
- Anti-colonial ideas reflecting US revolution
- Many Americans dislike the British because of events like the British Navy blocking US trade roots causing financial trouble
- Immigrants also dislike British
Why did the US enter WWI?
- 1915 - WJB resigns as Secretary of State, weakening anti-war elements
- TR and Cabot Lodge influential and pro-war
- Big business were pro-war as it would create jobs and money
The reasons for US entry into the First World War
Why did the US enter WWI? (cont.)
- Main reasons:
- Reports of German war crimes in Belgium - Increased anti-German feelings
- 1915 - German U-boats sink Lusitania, a liner going from New York to Liveprool. Angered the public and caused outage amongst politicians
- December 1916 - British government sent a secret report to the US saying they were bankrupt and couldn't win the war unless US joined
- Zimmerman Telegram - German/Mexican invasion of US
- February 1917 - Russian Revolution started. Joining Allies was a fight for democracy
- Decisive event - Zimmerman Telegram:
- 1916 - German economy so bad they decided to launch unrestricted submarine warfare in Atlantic, hoping to provoke US and get them to join WWI
- Wanted to distract US from domestic problems
- Germans proposed alliance with Mexico promising German support if Mexico attacked US
- Telegram intercepted by British who passed it onto Washington
The reasons for US entry into the First World War
Impact of US entry in WWI
- November 1918 - Allies win
- US wins first overseas war as part of an alliance with others
- US had to conscript a large army initially
- Took time for US troops to make an impact in Europe
- Took time to train and equip troops
- 1917 - Supply of US troops was small
- January 1918 - US troops arriving at a rate of 250,000 a month
- After US intervened in WWI, it was clear the Germans would lose
- November 1918 - Armistice
- US power and prestige grew
- Played big part in post-war peace
- 1918 - Wilson set out 14 points based on principles of self-determination and collective security
The role of the USA in the post-war peace settleme
Why didn't Wilson achieve what he wanted?
- Seen as Jesus by Europeans
- USA, unlike other countries, had not suffered exhaustion, economic burdens or huge military losses
- No way US could be blamed for starting war
- US's anti-colonial history made them appear trustworthy and morally superior
- Wilson's 14 points laid foundations for peace
- Peace settlement allowed smaller countries to decide own destinies with collective security and peace protected by international agreements
- One of the 14 points was to create a League of Nations
- However, it wasn't simple
- Wilson caught up in complex negotiations with 'Big Four'
- They were more concerned with extending their empires and punishing Germany
- Dealing with Germany was hard enough without the 'Big Four' interfering
- Small countries were emerging as new empires from their old ones
- Frustrated US diplomats as Wilson was spending most of his time sorting out land disputes
The role of the USA in the post-war peace settleme
Why didn't Wilson achieve what he wanted? (cont.)
- Wilson wanted to start with disarmament and setting up League of Nations
- However, most of the 1919-20 peacemakers too busy finalising treaties with 5 defeated powers
- Peace settlement not a complete failure - Diplomats did the best they could
- Expectations too high
- Congress didn't pass peace treaty until 1921
- Reflected Wilson's domestic problems
- Glow of victory quickly darkened
- Demobilisation of army caused racial tension and violence
- Economic problems at home
- Many believe rewards of war effort worthless
- 50,000 dead - Twice as many died because of Spanish Flu
Why did the US retreat into isolationism?
- US public against League of Nations
The role of the USA in the post-war peace settleme
Why did the US retreat into isolationism? (cont.)
- Opposition mainly due to Wilson's war-weariness and the public's lack of enthusiasm due to long negotiations
- Opposition to League of Nations:
- William Borah - Seantor of Idaho
- Led Republican 'Irreconcilables'
- Speech to Senate in 1919 against League of Nations was detrimental to Wilson's hopes
- Other opposition:
- Henry Cabot Lodge
- Urged US to act a world power independently
- Wilson still insisted League of Nations was way forward
- Wilson's personality became exhaustted
- Alienated associates and missed opportunity to compromise with HCL
- Wilson was very ill
- September 1919 - Had a stroke and collapsed
- Paralysed his left side
The role of the USA in the post-war peace settleme
Why did the US retreat into isolationism? (cont.)
- Blind in left eye
- Died 1924 when public realised extent of his illness
- Despite Wilson's campaigning, his policies were rejected in 1920
- League of Nations' voted against by Congress
- Democrats suffered defeat in 1920 election
- Republicans dominant in Senate and House
Comments
No comments have yet been made