A2 Edexcel Religious Language
- Created by: Tabitha Smith
- Created on: 22-02-14 21:13
What is Religious Language;
· It is speaking about God - the WAY people speak of Him, and WHY they do It is UNIQUE in the description of God, of beliefs and uses TECHNICAL TERMS such as 'sin' - everyday words which have a religious meaning
· Our words are NOT ADEQUATE to speak of God - this leads to MISUNDERSTANDING and CONFUSION
· Cognitive language –
o Realist Factual statements can be proved either true or false
o Or they contain meaningful, factual content (to believers)
o They are empirically proved
o Anthony Flew suggested it is "anything else but assertions"
· Non-cognitive language –
o Anti-Realist
o Deals with what is not to be taken factually but to be understood in other ways (symbols, myths, metaphors etc.)
o It expresses a religious truth, in a religious community
o There is no objective universal truth, it depends on the CONTEXT of the language
Verification Principle;
· ANALYTICAL statements - a priori - true by DEFINITION - contain OWN verification
· MATHEMATICAL statements - A.J.Ayer: Human error - not a genuine difference in the facts
· SYNTHETIC statements - verified/falsified through empirical testing - if you know HOW to test (even theoretically) it has meaning
· 1920s Vienna Circle - language had to be based on EXPERIENCE - verifiable by the SENSES - EMPIRICAL Religious claims are meaningless - subjective - not empirically testable - God has no literal significance - Ayer: God claims are not true OR false (cannot be valid)
· CRITICISMS –
o Opinions/Emotions are meaningless if following Ver. Prin.
o Laws of science are meaningless - 'always- cannot be tested
o Historical - no one left alive to vouch for past events - meaningless
o Ethics/ morals are meaningless - sacred/secular rules are based on universability
o The principle ITSELF cannot be verified - fails own test
o Ayer –
§ 'Strong' verification - NO DOUBT
§ 'Weak' verification - STRONG LIKELIHOOD
Falsification Principle;
· What in principle makes it false
· Flew:
o Religions are meaningless because nothing counts AGAINST them - if you say He exists then you must accept the POSSIBILITY that He may not - Or the religious language they use is meaningless as it is not falsifiable
o Anything is consistent with the claim - John Wisdom Parable of the Gardener
· ALTERNATIVES
o R.M.Hare –
§ 'Blik'
§ Religious…
Comments
No comments have yet been made