British foreign policy notes 1951-2007
- Created by: LU,KTGFVW
- Created on: 24-05-16 17:45
British foreign policy notes 1951-2007
1951 – 64:
· By 1951, Britain had already had to face up to the prospect of imperial decline
· This decline had begun after the first world war but it was the second world war that left Britain badly damaged, burdened with massive debts and in the shadow of 2 new military superpowers
· In 1947, Britain’s ambassador in Washington had to inform the Americans that the country face bankruptcy and would have to withdraw from commitments in Greece, Turkey and Palestine
· In the same year independence was given to India and Pakistan, marking Britain’s retreat from empire
· Political and public opinion was slow to recognise Britain’s reduced position in the world, or to see the implications for the future
· This slow realisation had profound consequences
· It delayed Britain’s involvement in European integration until 1973, when it could have easily been 20 years earlier
· It was only until after the humiliating Anglo-French military intervention at Suez in 1956 that Britain’s inability to act as a great power began to be realised
· Imperial illusions also held back the process of decolonisation
· Only in 1960, with Macmillan’s ‘Wind of Change’ speech did the British people begin to come to terms with the need to let go of colonies in Africa
· Even after 1960, there illusions kept British defence spending at impossibly high levels, including the massive costs of the independent nuclear deterrent
· And illusions influenced British ideas about the ‘special relationship’ with the united states and Britain’s role in the cold war
· By 1964 many of these illusions had been blown away, but not all of them
Britain’s declining imperial role: empire and commonwealth, 1951-64:
· By 1951, Britain’s retreat from empire had already begun
· The decision to withdraw from India in 1947 was the most dramatic example of this
· During the 1950s, the pressures of colonial independence movements became harder and harder to contain
· British forces found themselves fight Malaya, Kenya and Cyprus
· Nor was it only it only Britain who faced these pressures:
o France faced even bigger challenges in Vietnam and in Algeria
o Belgium and Portugal had to deal with revolts in their African colonies
· In the early 1950x, Britain’s rulers believed they could manage a gradual transition from empire to the new commonwealth and colonial resistance movements could be controlled until their peoples were ready for independence
· Nobody then had any idea of the sudden rush of independence that was waiting to happen
· In Malaya British forces fought a long and successful counter-insurgency campaign to defeat communist guerrilla forces
· When the Mau Mau rebellion broke out in Kenya in 1952, it was assumed that military repression would succeed against the Mau Mau too
· At the same time…
Comments
No comments have yet been made