How to Answer a Rylands v Fletcher Problem Question
- Created by: falloutgrace04
- Created on: 22-02-22 12:29
Introduction
The defendant (D) may be liable under Rylands v Fletcher for the damage to the C’s ___ when ___. This was due to the accumulation of ___ that escaped onto the C’s land causing damage.
Claimant
The C can pursue a claim under Rylands v Fletcher as they have exclusive possession (tenant) of/an interest (owner) in the property (Hunter v Canary Wharf).
Defendant
The D will be the defendant of the claim as they had control over the land (Read v Lyons) and/or brought the thing onto the land and accumulated it (Read v Lyons) as they ___. They are the defendant.
Brought onto the land and accumulated
[If the process is ‘natural’ like a lake, it can still be person-made].
The creation of the ___ was a non-natural process that allowed them to accumulate, so the D could be liable (Rylands v Fletcher).
They did not accumulate naturally like thistles (Gyles v Walker) as it is person-made because ___ were brought onto the land to ___.
There was a bringing onto the land and accumulation of a thing - ___.
Likely to cause mischief if escapes
___ is not inherently dangerous (Shiffman), but an accumulation of it is…
Comments
No comments have yet been made