What explains the fall of the USSR, c1985-91
- Created by: paulhaswell
- Created on: 11-06-18 09:16
Fullscreen
How important were economic weaknesses in bringing about the fall of the USSR?
Long-term economic weaknesses
- Weaknesses highlighted in Novobirsk Report of 1983 - inefficiency and inflexibility
- Report given to politburo - Gorbachev only member to recognise reform was needed
- Solution unclear - tried with trial and error which sent economy into chaos
Gorbachev's initial economic reforms: discipline and acceleration
- Reformers brought into party and conservatives dismissed - Yeltsin promoted
- Attacks on alcohol - drinking age raised, cost of vodka tripled
- Tax revenues fell - fiscal deficit
- Illegal alcohol produced which was unhygenic
Twelfth 5-year plan
- Focus on investement and central planning:
- Investment sweked towards construction - led to more spending which used more investment
- Equipment inefficient and broke down
- Industry slow to adapt to new technology
- Technological imports expensive
- Agriculture using lots of investment but making little progress
- Focus on quantity over quality
- Gorbachev unable to alter fundamental problems - faced too much opposition within party
- Tried to centralise resources and reduce waste with 'superministries' - unsuccessful
- Implemented by priveledged who didn't want to give up power
- Resistance from military - wanted all investment so other sectors suffered
- Went into deficit to solve this - didn't work just made Gorbachev look worse
Economic perestroika
- Restructuring of the economy - more elements of private enterprise:
- Encourgement of joint ventures, January 1987 - Foreign firms could establish business in USSR - Hoped it would make USSR more open to foreign technology
- Law on State Enterprises, June 1987 - Loosening of state control over wages and production
- Co-operatives were legalised in 1988 - Small-scale businesses established
Impact of perestroika
- Food production increased a little but still not enough
- Enterprises still subject to state intervention - state decided allocation of resources
- Products diverted from state shops to co-operatives (where prices were higher) - caused inflation and impacted poor people
- Poorer cities left devoid of adequate food and supplies
- High profits meant corrupt officials demande bribes for permission to operate
- Uncertainty led to hoarding - rationing introduced
- Power to managers led to increase in wages
- Bureasucracy made foreign investment a slow process
- Reforms undermined by officials
- The fall in price of oil had significant impact as was Russia's main export
- Weakened system without providing a replacement
- Gorbachev's failure undermined his political power
State Commision on Economic Reform
- July 1989 - report commisoned saying a radical solution needed - a market-led economy
- Split party - reformers in favour but conservatives not
- 500 days programme suggested - rejected by Soviet government, accepted by Russian Parliment
- Division between Party Leadership and national republics caused chaos
- Economy collapsed
How significant were the failures of Gorbachev's political reforms?
Glasnost and the need to reform the party
- Apparatus of state was huge and unmanageable - wasteful, corrupt etc.
- Relations between central planning and regions poor
- Glasnost was opening up party to public for new ideas
The impact of glasnost
- Became an open attack on the party:
- Complaints about housing were popular
- Investigations revealed details of Stalin's terror, the famine and…
Comments
Report