Stone and Dobinson is the case for which omission?
Voluntary
3 of 17
Name the case and omission: PC on duty, failed to stop a fight
Dytham and Official Position
4 of 17
Name the case for Contractual Duty
Pittwood
5 of 17
What omission did Gibbins and Proctor owe?
Relationship
6 of 17
What case is associated with smoking and arson?
Miller
7 of 17
In causation, what does 'No Actus Novus Interveniens' mean?
There must be no intervening act
8 of 17
In causation, what must be proved?
The prosecution must prove that the cause of death matches with the legal definition and factual definition
9 of 17
What is the point of law from Blaue?
D must take V as they find them
10 of 17
How can the chain of causation break?
Due to a separate act occurring
11 of 17
Strict Liability:
Requires no Mens Rea, just Actus Reus
12 of 17
Callow v Tillstone:
About some meat which was not fit for consumption
13 of 17
Strict Liability was created to:
Maintain standards and protect people
14 of 17
The Law Commission Draft Bill (reform) states that:
All crimes should need the Mens Rea, unless explicitly stated
15 of 17
Absolute Liability requires:
No Mens Rea and no Actus Reus
16 of 17
Name the case: D, removed by police from a hospital corridor because he was drunk, placed on a motorway, charged, as it is an offence to be in a public place drunk
Winsar
17 of 17
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
What is the case that goes with: Statutory Duty?
Back
s170 Road Traffic Act
Card 3
Front
Stone and Dobinson is the case for which omission?
Back
Card 4
Front
Name the case and omission: PC on duty, failed to stop a fight
Comments
No comments have yet been made