Approaches to History 3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating ? HistoryHistoryUniversityNone Created by: Clare BerginCreated on: 16-05-16 13:44 What has class identity retained? Social perspective 1 of 53 What has gender identity retained? Focus on women 2 of 53 What is the topic of paragraph one? Marxist historians 3 of 53 Who was the trailblazer for Marxist history? Georges Lefebvre 4 of 53 When did Lefebvre write? 1939 5 of 53 What did Lefebvre look at? The bourgeoisie and peasantry 6 of 53 What did Lefebvre argue? That all classes combined under the leadership of the aristocracy to overthrow the monarchy 7 of 53 How was Lefebvre's argument linked to Marx? Thesis and antithesis 8 of 53 What other two factors of Lefebvre's work were Marxist? Inevitability and economics 9 of 53 Who wrote 'the age of revolution'? Eric Hobsbawm 10 of 53 When did Hobsbawm write? 1962 11 of 53 What did Hobsbawm emphasise? Conflict between old regime and 'rising new social forces' 12 of 53 What did Hobsbawm argue created unity? Classical liberal thought 13 of 53 Who is the final Marxist historian? Alfred Soboul 14 of 53 When did Soboul write? 1982 15 of 53 What did Soboul emphasise as an indicator of class? Economics 16 of 53 How did Soboul summarise the revolution? As a conflict between the relations of production and the character of productive forces 17 of 53 What does Soboul show? That general trends do not account for all historians 18 of 53 What is paragraph 2 on? Revisionist 19 of 53 What did the revisionists say Marxism encouraged? Twisting facts to fit theories 20 of 53 Who is the early revisionist? Alfred Cobban 21 of 53 When did Cobban write? 1964 22 of 53 What did Cobban focus on? Difficulty of assigning class 23 of 53 What did Cobban say clear cut classes resulted in? A generalised view rather than specific analysis 24 of 53 How else did Cobban undermine Marxism? Said economics not fundamental to determining class 25 of 53 Who was more typical of the second half of the 20thC? Cobban 26 of 53 Why was Cobban more typical? Increase of social and cultural sources as well as political ones 27 of 53 Who is the last class historian? Francois Furet 28 of 53 When did Furet write? 1981 29 of 53 What criticisms did Furet put forward? Similar to Cobban 30 of 53 Why is Furet significant? Demonstrates impact of politics on historians 31 of 53 How does Furet show this? Says he was writing at a time when Soviet totalitarianism was criticised by both sides 32 of 53 What does this explain about early thinkers of Marxism? Early 20thC saw successful 'Marxist' revolution and growth in power of state - encouraged Marxist view of history 33 of 53 What does paragraph 3 look at? Early gender identity 34 of 53 How does paragraph 3 link to previous paragraphs? Continued emphasis on women 35 of 53 Who was the first to take a gender perspective? Joan B. Landes 36 of 53 When did Landes write? 1982 37 of 53 What did Landes state at first? That she was taking a feminist perspective 38 of 53 What does Landes look at? How women were politically silenced during the French revolution 39 of 53 What theory does Landes make use of in her argument? The separate spheres theory 40 of 53 Why does this theory make her argument redundant? Later historians have shown it to be too simplistic 41 of 53 What does Landes' argument reflect? Second wave feminism 42 of 53 What is paragraph 4 on? Recent gender historians 43 of 53 Who is the first historian in paragraph 4? Olwen Hufton 44 of 53 When did Hufton write? 1992 45 of 53 What did Hufton argue? That women act on own volition not because of enforced societal roles 46 of 53 What did Hufton say was a result of the separate spheres theory? Generic, theoretical women 47 of 53 Who is the final historian? Lisa DiCaprio 48 of 53 When did DiCaprio write? 2007 49 of 53 What did DiCaprio focus on? Women and state in terms of welfare policy - how they were shapers as well as receivers 50 of 53 How did DiCaprio show that women were politically active? Standing up for their rights 51 of 53 What rights did DiCaprio mean? Higher wages and better working conditions 52 of 53 What wider shift in gender thought does this show? Move from a view of male suppression to a consideration of nuances of gender relations 53 of 53
how have different historians approached the question of of objectivity and evidence in historical practice 0.0 / 5
Comments
No comments have yet been made