Case Law 0.0 / 5 ? Revision SkillsContract LawOtherOther Created by: Hayley TurpinCreated on: 07-10-19 12:37 Condition Poussard v Spears Pond 1876; Behn v Burness 1862 1 of 38 Warranty Bettiny v Gye 1896 2 of 38 Innominate Terms Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd 1962 3 of 38 Formation of a contract (four elements) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1892 4 of 38 Unilateral Contract Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1892 5 of 38 Doctrine of Privity Contract Dunlop v Selfridges 1915; Tweddle v Atkinson 1831 6 of 38 Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Business Agreements Edmonds v Lawson 2000 7 of 38 Honour Clauses Rose & Frank v Crompton 1923 8 of 38 Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Social and Domestic Agreements Jones v Padavatton 1968 9 of 38 Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Social and Domestic Agreements - Domestic Situation Merritt v Merritt 1970 10 of 38 Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Social and Domestic Agreements - Social Situation Simpkins v Pays 1955 11 of 38 Offer: Certain Terms Scammel & Nephew Ltd v Ouston 1994 12 of 38 Offer: Must be communicated Taylor v Laird 1856 13 of 38 ITT Harris v Nickerson 1873 (Auction); Payne v Cave 1789 14 of 38 Mere Statement of Price Clifton v Palumbo 1944 'I am prepared'; Gibson v Manchester CC 1979 'maybe prepared' 15 of 38 Terms of Contract - Mere Puffs Mead v Babbington 2007 16 of 38 Terms of Contract - Importance attached to the statement Bannerman v White 1861 17 of 38 Terms of Contract - whether statement put into writing Birch v Paramount Estates Ltd 1956 18 of 38 Terms of Contract -Timing of Statement Routledge v McKay 1954 19 of 38 Terms of Contract -whether the parties have specialist skills and knowledge Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams 1957 compared to **** Bentley Production Ltd v Harold Smith (motors) Ltd 1965 20 of 38 Case Law Also known as Legal Authority 21 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - By Signature L'Strange v F Graucob Ltd 1934 22 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Exception to rule Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dying Co 1951 23 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Notice Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel 1949 24 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Consistent course of dealings J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw 1956 compared to Hollier v Rambler Motors 1972 25 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Understanding of the parties British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire 1975 26 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Reasonable notice Parker v South Eastern Railway Co 1877; L'Strange v F Graucob 1934 27 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Timing of notice Olly v Marlborough Hotel 1949; Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking 1971 28 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Type of document Chappleton v Barry Urban District Council 1940 29 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Type of Clause (redhand rule) J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw 1956 (consistent) compared to Hollier v Rambler Motors 1972 (not consistent) 30 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Type of Clause (redhand rule) Inter Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd 1998 (distinguished from) Photo Library Group Ltd v Burda Senator Vertag GMBH 2008 31 of 38 Incorporation of Terms - Incorporation through a common understanding of the parties British Crane Hire Corp Ltd v Ipswich Plant Hire 1975 32 of 38 Classification of Terms - Terms implied by Statute Acts of Parliament 33 of 38 Classification of Terms - Original (older) Acts The Sale of Goods Act 1979 - Business to Business; The Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 - Business to Business Relationships 34 of 38 Classification of Terms - The New Act Classification of Terms - The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - Business to Consumer Relathionships 35 of 38 The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - CRA2015:S9 Satisfactory Quality Grant v Australian Knitting Mill 36 of 38 The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - CRA2015:S10 Fit for Purpose Priest v Last 1903 37 of 38 The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - CRA2015:S11 (strict) Modern Interpretation Old case - Moore v Landauer 1921 38 of 38
Comments
No comments have yet been made