Causation

1. Thin skull principle also includes mental conditions and beliefs as of R v _____ (1975) 1 WLR 1416 (5)
4. R v ______ [1996] Crim LR 35 - act or omission must be "something more than a slight or trifling link" (6)
5. R v Cato [1976] 1 WLR 110 made it clear in relation to the de minimis rule that there must be a more than _______ cause (7)
6. Novus Actus Interveniens in English is a new _________ act (11)
8. R v _______ (1847) Cox 273 made it clear that the result must be caused by a culpable act (8)

2. R v Roberts [1971] 56 Cr App R 95 - If the victim responds in a way that a reasonable person could not have predicted, the resulting consequences will not be regarded as reasonably _________ and will be regarded as an independent intervening act. (11)
3. Latin terminology for the but for test (4, 3, 3)
7. R v ____ (1910) 2 KB 124 created the but for test (5)
9. Also, the Thin Skull Principle includes neglect or ill treatment by victims of themselves, defined in R v Holland (1841) and R v ____ (1996) (4)
10. R v ______ (1983) 76 Cr App R - D's conduct must contribute significantly to the result. It need not be the sole cause or even the main cause (6)

Get Revising