Which case extended the ruling in MPC v Charles 1973 to include credit cards?
R v Lambie
1 of 2
Could somebody who holds up a sign asking for money for food because they are homeless when in fact they aren't be found liable for false representation?
Yes
2 of 2
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Could somebody who holds up a sign asking for money for food because they are homeless when in fact they aren't be found liable for false representation?
Comments
No comments have yet been made