Psychology Research Methods
0.0 / 5
- Created by: StudyQueen;)
- Created on: 14-06-24 16:40
what is a lab experiment
pros+cons
pros+cons
controlled environment, IV deliberately changed by researcher.
p= standardised procedures and high internal validity
c= low ecological validity and demand characteristics
p= standardised procedures and high internal validity
c= low ecological validity and demand characteristics
1 of 32
what is a field experiment
pros+cons
pros+cons
naturally occurring environment, IV deliberately changed, and measured effect on DV.
p= high ecological validity and reduce the chances of demand characteristics
c= ethical issues and low internal validity
p= high ecological validity and reduce the chances of demand characteristics
c= ethical issues and low internal validity
2 of 32
what is a natural experiment
pros+cons
pros+cons
IV occurs without researcher - happens by itself.
p=external validity and suitability for topics that can't be studied in a lab setting
c= low internal validity and researcher bias
p=external validity and suitability for topics that can't be studied in a lab setting
c= low internal validity and researcher bias
3 of 32
what are independant groups
pros+cons
pros+cons
pps allocated to diff. groups where each group represents 1 experimental condition.
p= no order affects and external validity
c=time consuming and pvs
p= no order affects and external validity
c=time consuming and pvs
4 of 32
what are repeated measures
pros+cons
pros+cons
pps take part in all conditions of the study.
p=control pvs and fewer pps required
c= order effects and demand characteristics
p=control pvs and fewer pps required
c= order effects and demand characteristics
5 of 32
what are matched pairs
pros+cons
pros+cons
pairs of pps are matched in terms of variables relevant to study, 1member of each pair takes part in condition A, 1 takes part in condition B.
p=no order effects and reduced pvs
c= time consuming and not perfect match
p=no order effects and reduced pvs
c= time consuming and not perfect match
6 of 32
what is demand characteristics
cues that might indicate the study aims to participants. These cues can lead participants to change their behaviours or responses based on what they think the research is about= bias
7 of 32
what is social desirability
occurs when participants automatically try to respond in ways that make them seem likeable in a study, even if it means misrepresenting how they truly feel.
8 of 32
pros and cons of the mean
p= sensitive as represents whole data set
c=distorted by outliers
c=distorted by outliers
9 of 32
pros and cons of the median
p= not sensitive as not affected by extremes
c- not sensitive (doesn't include whole data set= not rep.)
c- not sensitive (doesn't include whole data set= not rep.)
10 of 32
pros and cons of the mode
p= easy calculation
c= unrepresentative
c= unrepresentative
11 of 32
pros and cons of the range
p= easy calculation
c= distorted by outliers
c= distorted by outliers
12 of 32
difference between bar charts and histograms
b= space between bars (discontinuous data)
x axis= IV/possible answers
h= no spaces between bars (continuous data)
x axis= categories
both= start at 0, y axis=frequency, title= bar chart/histogram to show...
x axis= IV/possible answers
h= no spaces between bars (continuous data)
x axis= categories
both= start at 0, y axis=frequency, title= bar chart/histogram to show...
13 of 32
what is the normal distribution represented by
a bell curve
14 of 32
random sampling
pros+cons
pros+cons
p= less chance of researcher bias
c= may still end up bias
c= may still end up bias
15 of 32
opportunity sampling
pros+cons
pros+cons
p= easy to do
c= not representative
c= not representative
16 of 32
systematic sampling
pros+cons
pros+cons
p= no researcher bias
c= may still end up bias
c= may still end up bias
17 of 32
stratified sampling
pros+cons
pros+cons
p= most representative
c= lengthy
c= lengthy
18 of 32
what are the 5 ethical issues written by the BPS
1) informed consent
2) deception
3)protection from harm
4)privacy
5) confidentiality
2) deception
3)protection from harm
4)privacy
5) confidentiality
19 of 32
how to deal with these issues
1) presumptive, prior general, retrospective
2) told at debrief
3) offered counselling
4) personal data not made public
5) anonymity/ data locked/ stored away + not shared
2) told at debrief
3) offered counselling
4) personal data not made public
5) anonymity/ data locked/ stored away + not shared
20 of 32
questionnaires pros+cons
p= lots of info quickly= can gather lots of responses= generalisations
c= pps may lie= social desirability= not genuine feelings= reduced validity
c= pps may lie= social desirability= not genuine feelings= reduced validity
21 of 32
interviews pros+cons
p= lots of detailed info= gain insight= validity
c=can be difficult to analyse= researcher has to interpret= researcher bias
c=can be difficult to analyse= researcher has to interpret= researcher bias
22 of 32
observations pros+cons
p=better indication of behaviour, look at real=life behaviour
c= may be ethical issues and observer bias
(behaviour categories= target behaviour and categories)
c= may be ethical issues and observer bias
(behaviour categories= target behaviour and categories)
23 of 32
naturalistic, controlled and covert pros+cons
p=high in external validity
c=can't control EVs
p= some control over EVs
c= low in external validity
p=increased validity
c= ethics
c=can't control EVs
p= some control over EVs
c= low in external validity
p=increased validity
c= ethics
24 of 32
overt, non-pp, pp pros+cons
p= no ethical issues
c= decreased validity (sd)
p= remain objective
c= may lose valuable insight
p=increased validity
c= lose objectivity (going native)
c= decreased validity (sd)
p= remain objective
c= may lose valuable insight
p=increased validity
c= lose objectivity (going native)
25 of 32
case studies pros+cons
p=best way to study unusual forms of behaviour(insight on general functioning), detailed
c=often concern unique people/events= can't generalise, ethical issues
c=often concern unique people/events= can't generalise, ethical issues
26 of 32
primary data and secondary data pros+cons
p= suits aims of research
c= time/effort
p=easy access
c=may not fit
c= time/effort
p=easy access
c=may not fit
27 of 32
qualitative and quantitative pros+ cons
p= depth/detail
c=difficult to analyse
p=easy analysis
c= lacks depth/detail
c=difficult to analyse
p=easy analysis
c= lacks depth/detail
28 of 32
internal vs. external validity
Internal validity examines whether the study design, conduct, and analysis answer the research questions without bias.
External validity examines whether the study findings can be generalised to other contexts.
External validity examines whether the study findings can be generalised to other contexts.
29 of 32
what is ecological validity/ mundane realism
how applicable something is to real life
30 of 32
correlational study advantages
May predict causal relationships
May predict human behaviours
May predict human behaviours
31 of 32
correlational study disadvantages
There is no cause and effect
No inferences can be found by results
No inferences can be found by results
32 of 32
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
what is a field experiment
pros+cons
pros+cons
Back
naturally occurring environment, IV deliberately changed, and measured effect on DV.
p= high ecological validity and reduce the chances of demand characteristics
c= ethical issues and low internal validity
p= high ecological validity and reduce the chances of demand characteristics
c= ethical issues and low internal validity
Card 3
Front
what is a natural experiment
pros+cons
pros+cons
Back
Card 4
Front
what are independant groups
pros+cons
pros+cons
Back
Card 5
Front
what are repeated measures
pros+cons
pros+cons
Back
Similar Psychology resources:
4.5 / 5 based on 3 ratings
1.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
4.5 / 5 based on 3 ratings
5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
Comments
Report