Unjustified Enrichment

?
  • Created by: eszter_
  • Created on: 05-03-23 10:34
Shilliday v Smith 1998 SC 725
Shilliday improved Smith's house in anticipation of marriage and recovered value of improvements using condictio causa data causa non secuta
1 of 5
Satchwell v McIntosh 2006 SLT (Sh Ct) 117
Condictio causa data causa non secuta can be used in an agreement to continue cohabiting
2 of 5
Harper Collins Publishers Ltd v Young [2007] CSOH 65
Property sold and therefore profit from sale recoverable
3 of 5
Responses to Unjustified Enrichment
- Restitution
- Repetition
- Recompense
- Shilliday v Smith 1998 SC 725
4 of 5
Recompense
Recovery of a benefit, content expressed in extent of D's enrichment
5 of 5

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Condictio causa data causa non secuta can be used in an agreement to continue cohabiting

Back

Satchwell v McIntosh 2006 SLT (Sh Ct) 117

Card 3

Front

Property sold and therefore profit from sale recoverable

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

- Restitution
- Repetition
- Recompense
- Shilliday v Smith 1998 SC 725

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

Recovery of a benefit, content expressed in extent of D's enrichment

Back

Preview of the back of card 5

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Unjustified Enrichment resources »